Lessons From Chicago

No Limits Update: FCC Blocks Nationwide Broadband

September 13th, 2007

Last time, we reported how Chicago had become the next metro area to succumb to the Wi-Fi domino effect. As it turns out, Cincinnati has become the next. The problem appears to be that these cities don't want to commit to being an anchor tenant for the network, which network providers are starting to require in their proposals. And who can blame them? The cliche isn't spend money to lose money. The provider is just looking for a return on investment.

MidwestBusiness.com suggests that the cities step up and take an active role in funding the network.

While putting in a real network infrastructure isn't cheap, it should be looked at as a long-term investment for regional economic development just like an airport or an intercontinental dock and shipping facility.
But where are the cities going to get the funding? The obvious answer is through taxes just like other capital improvement projects. But what citizen wants to approve a tax when they either A) already pay for their own service, or B) can walk into any number of restaurants and bars that are a Wi-Fi hot spot?

What has worked for cities like Lafayette, La., and Bristol, Va., is a government funded build-outs, wherein the municipality owns the system and can provide competitive rates for services. But can that work on a nationwide scale?

0 Comments So Far

Kick start the discussion by filling out the form below.

Leave a Comment

     _      ____     ____   ____    _  _     _____ 
    / \    |___ \   / ___| | __ )  | || |   |___ / 
   / _ \     __) | | |     |  _ \  | || |_    |_ \ 
  / ___ \   / __/  | |___  | |_) | |__   _|  ___) |
 /_/   \_\ |_____|  \____| |____/     |_|   |____/ 
                                                   
Please type the letters and numbers you see above in the field below: